Guix, Ludo', I was surprised by this commit: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- commit 426ade6c8bdab243da719e369a887284368179bb (upstream/master) Author: Xinglu Chen import: go: Replace underscores with hyphens in package names. As per section '16.4.2 Package Naming' in the manual, use hypens [sic] instead of underscores in package names. * guix/import/go.scm (go-module->guix-package-name): Replace underscores with hyphens. Signed-off-by: Leo Famulari --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Indeed, underscores were explicitly banned in 2014 (commit 25083588). Why? Where's the advantage in renaming the following packages from their canonical names? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- λ ./pre-inst-env guix lint -c name # not upstream yet :-) guix/packages.scm:464:2: efi_analyzer@0.0.0-0.77c9e3a: name should not contain '_' gnu/packages/file-systems.scm:606:10: jfs_fsck-static@1.1.15: name should not contain '_' gnu/packages/installers.scm:36:12: nsis-x86_64@3.05: name should not contain '_' gnu/packages/mingw.scm:47:12: mingw-w64-x86_64@8.0.0: name should not contain '_' gnu/packages/mingw.scm:47:12: mingw-w64-x86_64-winpthreads@8.0.0: name should not contain '_' gnu/packages/perl.scm:2264:10: perl-crypt-unixcrypt_xs@0.11: name should not contain '_' gnu/packages/python-web.scm:2528:10: python-requests_ntlm@1.1.0: name should not contain '_' gnu/packages/ruby.scm:5450:10: ruby-progress_bar@1.1.0: name should not contain '_' gnu/packages/ruby.scm:9222:10: ruby_version@1.0.2: name should not contain '_' gnu/packages/ruby.scm:4808:10: ruby-data_uri@0.1.0: name should not contain '_' --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I'd rather change the manual to allow underscores than blacklist them, but am curious why they were cancelled in the first place. Kind regards, T G-R