From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: "Sergio Pastor Pérez" <sergio.pastorperez@outlook.es>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Should we document how to detect if build machines are reachable before trying to offload?
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 14:56:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v80yoqcp.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PAXP251MB0348D24F884757DC4A004500F3A52@PAXP251MB0348.EURP251.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> ("Sergio Pastor Pérez"'s message of "Thu, 11 Jul 2024 22:23:42 +0200")
Hi,
Sergio Pastor Pérez <sergio.pastorperez@outlook.es> skribis:
>> Do you remember exactly under what circumstances it hangs? I think
>> ‘guix offload’ should handle that situation gracefully and we should fix
>> it if it does not.
>
> Yeah. It happens when I have a build machine configured like so and I
> disconnect it from the Ethernet connection:
>
> (build-machines
> (list
> #~(build-machine
> (name "remote")
> (systems (list "x86_64-linux" "i686-linux"))
> (host-key %remote-host-key
> (private-key %local-key))))
>
>
> With this configuration `guix offload test` will timeout after 30
> seconds, as you describe. But this other command will hang indefinitely:
>
> $ timeout 1m guix build imhex -M 0
> The following derivation will be built:
> /gnu/store/9absqzdd4ak3pms2jw6rkhlmjvm8zzyv-imhex-1.35.1.drv
> process 12199 acquired build slot '/var/guix/offload/bordercollie:22/0'
> guix offload: error: failed to connect to 'bordercollie': No route to host
> waiting for locks or build slots...
> process 12199 acquired build slot '/var/guix/offload/bordercollie:22/0'
> guix offload: error: failed to connect to 'bordercollie': No route to host
I believe the problem here is that offloading always wants to offload.
That is, when all the machines in /etc/guix/machines.scm are
unavailable, ‘guix offload’ says so to guix-daemon, but then guix-daemon
just keeps retrying (if you had more than one machine in
/etc/guix/machines.scm, one of which is unavailable, ‘guix offload’
would just pick another one.)
I guess this is probably what we should permit: building locally when we
cannot offload.
Does that make sense?
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-21 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-04 15:45 Should we document how to detect if build machines are reachable before trying to offload? Sergio Pastor Pérez
2024-07-11 9:48 ` Ludovic Courtès
2024-07-11 20:23 ` Sergio Pastor Pérez
2024-07-21 12:56 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2024-07-21 15:59 ` Sergio Pastor Pérez
2024-07-21 16:26 ` Vincent Legoll
2024-07-21 17:25 ` Tomas Volf
2024-07-22 14:59 ` Simon Tournier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v80yoqcp.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=sergio.pastorperez@outlook.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).