From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jose.marchesi@oracle.com (Jose E. Marchesi) Subject: Re: GSoC status Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:58:06 +0200 Message-ID: <87tx9krnj5.fsf@oracle.com> References: <8738h4jkfu.fsf@gnu.org> <87oazsauno.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <87ha5kgff1.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd0Rb-0007sF-M9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:54:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd0RS-0005C9-Un for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:54:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ha5kgff1.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:48:50 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, samuel.thibault@gnu.org, Thomas Schwinge >> The lesson is that I should have been more cautious. Probably that >> process would be best handled by a group of people. > > We must keep in mind that email is no longer reliable, given the > widespread use of aggressive and heuristic spam filtering today. Yeah. :-/ Well, in this case I would have expected an explicit ack from us: I replied to all the emails confirming that the relevant proposals were accepted in melange, also to prevent typos (like listing the wrong proposal) from the mentors.