From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: GSoC status Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:24:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87tx9jd6qc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8738h4jkfu.fsf@gnu.org> <87oazsauno.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <87ha5kgff1.fsf@gnu.org> <87tx9krnj5.fsf@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42667) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd5b1-0001Yl-LN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:24:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd5au-0004W2-T7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:24:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87tx9krnj5.fsf@oracle.com> (Jose E. Marchesi's message of "Wed, 23 Apr 2014 18:58:06 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: "Jose E. Marchesi" Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, samuel.thibault@gnu.org, Thomas Schwinge jose.marchesi@oracle.com (Jose E. Marchesi) skribis: > >> The lesson is that I should have been more cautious. Probably that > >> process would be best handled by a group of people. > > > > We must keep in mind that email is no longer reliable, given the > > widespread use of aggressive and heuristic spam filtering today. >=20=20=20=20=20 > Yeah. :-/ >=20=20=20=20=20 > Well, in this case I would have expected an explicit ack from us Definitely, I haven=E2=80=99t been cautious enough. Ludo=E2=80=99.