From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: Add pt-scotch package.
Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 19:18:59 -0500
Message-ID: <87tx8oq6q4.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <8761l57xs2.fsf@gmail.com> <8761l44rec.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44019)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@gmail.com>) id 1Wlolq-00048o-LV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 20:16:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ericbavier@gmail.com>) id 1Wloll-0007wa-0e
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 17 May 2014 20:16:06 -0400
In-reply-to: <8761l44rec.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Ludovic Courtès writes:

> Eric Bavier <ericbavier@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> From 936d49e8b0651a0e3b4674fcd34308c1d396de72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org>
>> Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 00:31:59 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH 3/4] gnu: Add pt-scotch package.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/maths.scm (pt-scotch): New variable.
>
> Looks good to me.  One question:
>
>> +           (call-with-output-file "Makefile.inc"
>> +             (lambda (port)
>> +               (format port "
[...]
>
> Could this be factorized with Scotch?

I probably could be.  I will look at it some more.

-- 
Eric Bavier