From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ntp
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:03:51 -0400
Message-ID: <87tx31ox14.fsf@yeeloong.lan>
References: <1413645106-14116-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org>
	<87egu5qraf.fsf@yeeloong.lan>
	<20141018180813.28846.32077@vulcan.local.tld>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33188)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1Xfc7W-0002eA-T9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:05:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1Xfc7O-0005UB-KV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:05:06 -0400
Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:39594)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1Xfc7O-0005SM-HJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:04:58 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20141018180813.28846.32077@vulcan.local.tld> (Ian Denhardt's
	message of "Sat, 18 Oct 2014 14:08:13 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ian Denhardt <ian@zenhack.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ian Denhardt <ian@zenhack.net> writes:

> Quoting Mark H Weaver (2014-10-18 12:24:56)
>>   (string-join (take (string-split version #\.) 2)
>>                ".")
>
> <snip>
>
>> I suppose we should add a procedure specifically for this, but
>> it can wait, and it should be in a separate commit anyway.
>
> I'm going to grab this and try to have a patch submitted today or
> tomorrow.

Sounds good!

> Does guix/utils.scm seem like a sensible place to put this?

Yes, it fits in well with 'version-compare' and 'version>?'.

    Thanks,
      Mark