From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: New year, new name! Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:50:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87tx04g7vd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87egra60mo.fsf@gnu.org> <87k311v52t.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87egr9p5kj.fsf@gnu.org> <54AAC19F.6020402@openmailbox.org> <874ms4vpx2.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35679) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8GTc-0000yD-MK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:50:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8GTY-0007vz-K7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:50:20 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:56252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y8GTY-0007vT-Dn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2015 17:50:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874ms4vpx2.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> ("Taylan Ulrich \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:11:21 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") skribis: > Felipe L=C3=B3pez writes: > >> On 05/01/15 11:15, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> I agree with what you write, that is, we don=E2=80=99t want to do too m= uch >>> branding around that name, and instead emphasize GNU. In my view, this >>> is indeed some sort of a code name for use in technical docs and such. > > FYI, I did not receive the e-mail from which the above quote by Ludovic > seems to be, though I can see it in the ML archives. Perhaps the ML > software had a glitch and didn't send it to me. Actually GMail has been rejecting my messages for a couple of weeks or so for reasons have yet to understand. (And of course you=E2=80=99ll never= get this message. :-)) Ludo=E2=80=99.