From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Wireless networking in guix
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:04:46 +0100
Message-ID: <87twzcl6hd.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <CAMwaQALsc=byh=tNgOPVY3oMahxgzfa9+a67Fmr+dD10g6PFTg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42449)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YG5p9-00071g-Sx
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:04:56 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YG5p3-0003gO-5i
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:04:55 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51414)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YG5p3-0003gK-2v
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:04:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAMwaQALsc=byh=tNgOPVY3oMahxgzfa9+a67Fmr+dD10g6PFTg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Omar Radwan's message of "Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:56:46 -0800")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Omar Radwan <toxemicsquire4@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

I=E2=80=99ve used wicd in the past, and I agree it would be good to have it.
It needs packaging and a service definition, both of which should be
relatively easy.

Any takers?  :-)

Ludo=E2=80=99.