From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sox. Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 19:14:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87twt6hda1.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87d1zuhgd0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37121) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZF3nH-0004a4-CU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:15:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZF3nC-0007yW-6m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:14:59 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:25716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZF3nB-0007vg-T8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:14:54 -0400 In-reply-to: <87d1zuhgd0.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org > Is "audio.scm" the right place for this package? BTW there is > "audacity.scm"; shouldn't 'audacity' package be moved to "audio.scm" as > well? I would say “audio.scm” is the right place. ‘audacity’ was placed in its own module to avoid dependency cycles, if I recall correctly. (While we are talking about moving stuff, I suggest moving packages from ‘pulseaudio.scm’ to just ‘audio.scm’.) ~~ Ricardo