From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul van der Walt Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add Mlucas. Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 12:34:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87twpdamn0.fsf@denknerd.org> References: <20151025141201.0f64fc35@debian> Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51372) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqg3R-0007Pb-2A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 07:35:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqg3M-0004Xm-3L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 07:35:09 -0400 Received: from mx01.mykolab.com ([95.128.36.1]:61620 helo=mx-out03.mykolab.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zqg3L-0004W0-Tp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 07:35:04 -0400 In-reply-to: <20151025141201.0f64fc35@debian> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Vong Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello Alex, On 2015-10-25 at 07:12, quoth Alex Vong: > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add Mlucas. > > ... > > * gnu/packages/mlucas.scm: New file. I'm not an expert, and i'm not 100% sure on this so it's an honest question, but does this application really deserve a new package file? Shouldn't mlucas perhaps be added to maths.scm? Cheers, p.