From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: swh-plugins-lv2: New variable [WIP] v2
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 09:54:23 +0100
Message-ID: <87twnt9v7k.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <5664BA45.3080600@gmx.net> <5664BB8C.6030100@gmx.net>
	<87wpsqm00d.fsf@elephly.net> <5665FD19.3090905@gmx.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51708)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a6E2X-000776-08
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 03:54:29 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a6E2U-0004PE-9h
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 03:54:28 -0500
In-Reply-To: <5665FD19.3090905@gmx.net> (Florian Paul Schmidt's message of
	"Mon, 7 Dec 2015 22:41:45 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Florian Paul Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Florian Paul Schmidt <mista.tapas@gmx.net> skribis:

> fps@cherry ~/src/guix [env]$ ./pre-inst-env guix lint swh-plugins-lv2
> ;;; note: source file /home/fps/src/guix/gnu/packages/audio.scm
> ;;;       newer than compiled /home/fps/src/guix/gnu/packages/audio.go
> fps@cherry ~/src/guix [env]$
> -11-11-5098e09e255eaed14e0d40ca5e7e6dfcb782d7ea
> [formatting]...me]...ive]...
>
> See how the new prompt is in the middle of the lint output? I suspect
> broken terminfo entries or something (command editing in bash is
> seriously broken as well for commands longer than a line).. If I add a
> trailing whitespace in the package definition I get:

As discussed on IRC yesterday, this appears to be due to careless use of
=E2=80=98\r=E2=80=99 in (guix scripts lint) to return to the beginning of t=
he line,
which doesn=E2=80=99t actually erase the line (it does erase it in shell-mo=
de,
but that=E2=80=99s probably an exception.)  Leo has ideas on how to fix it.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.