From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] version bump libgcrypt -> 1.7 Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:27:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87twiygd7n.fsf@libertad.pw> References: <877ffx45n6.fsf@libertad.pw> <8737qkeknd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oa98ftn4.fsf@libertad.pw> <20160418203241.GA26832@jasmine> <87twiyhul1.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49595) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asRxL-0002DD-JS for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:28:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asRxI-0002Ah-Ek for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:28:27 -0400 Received: from hello.itaskmanager.ovh ([94.23.19.21]:58105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asRxI-0001hf-8r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:28:24 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hello.itaskmanager.ovh (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57345FAB1 for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:29:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hello.itaskmanager.ovh ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (itaskmanager.ovh [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SjrQ5tAufAxi for ; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:29:47 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87twiyhul1.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Tue, 19 Apr 2016 11:27:22 +0300") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost writes: > Leo Famulari (2016-04-18 23:32 +0300) wrote: > >> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:53:51AM +0200, ng0 wrote: >>> Updated libgcrypt patch. >> >> Is there a consensus on upgrading from 1.6.5 and making the change on >> core-updates? > > I think this is the right thing to do, but I would wait for a more > authoritative opinion (Ludovic, Mark or Andreas). Okay, so both patches are applicable we just have to wait on another persons opinion on which one to apply. --=20 =E2=99=A5=E2=92=B6 ng0