From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] version bump libgcrypt -> 1.7 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 19:03:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87twiwqkk3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <877ffx45n6.fsf@libertad.pw> <8737qkeknd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oa98ftn4.fsf@libertad.pw> <20160418203241.GA26832@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asvXY-0003vc-SG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:03:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1asvXY-0003Zk-5M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:03:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160418203241.GA26832@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon, 18 Apr 2016 16:32:41 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:53:51AM +0200, ng0 wrote: >> Updated libgcrypt patch. > > Is there a consensus on upgrading from 1.6.5 and making the change on > core-updates? OK for doing it in =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99! In an ideal world, we=E2=80=99d do it in a separate branch to check for breakage, but currently we lack the computational resources to do so. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.