From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add proxychains-ng.
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 19:16:13 +0200
Message-ID: <87twen1db6.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87ziohc1wo.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160812181308.GB14494@jasmine>
	<87k2fjy1ib.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52940)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bYz1P-0001eK-Ei
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:16:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bYz1K-0004jw-Dn
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:16:26 -0400
Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:24910)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bYz1K-0004jr-5X
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 13:16:22 -0400
In-reply-to: <87k2fjy1ib.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:

> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 05:50:15PM +0000, ng0 wrote:
>>> * gnu/packages/networking.scm (proxychains-ng): New variable.
>>
>>> +    (arguments
>>> +     `(#:tests? #f
>>> +       #:make-flags (list "CC=gcc")
>>> +       #:phases
>>> +       (modify-phases %standard-phases
>>> +         ;; Needs to be configured through the configure script.
>>> +         (replace 'configure
>>> +           (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
>>> +             (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")))
>>> +               (zero? (system* "./configure"
>>> +                               (string-append "--prefix=" out)))))))))
>>
>> Does #:configure-flags not work in this case?
>
> The previous message was too much. I just wanted to point out that
> configure-flags does not seem to work in this case, but in case I made a
> mistake I appended the patch with #:configure-flags in the previous
> message. For me, the version with system ./configure works, the one with
> #:configure-flags produces a failed build.

Could you show us the error message in case of using
“#:configure-flags”?  This really should work, so if it fails I’d like
to fix this instead of working around it, if possible.

~~ Ricardo