From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: lynx: Fix GnuTLS support. Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:22:27 -0400 Message-ID: <87twcm7qv0.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87oa2x3rxc.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20161007012854.GB6335@jasmine> <877f9k8bkx.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r37rnds6.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42861) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuOt-0000Dv-5I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:23:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuOp-0002DV-06 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:23:02 -0400 Received: from mail.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.34]:34038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsuOo-00024R-Mp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Oct 2016 12:22:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r37rnds6.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> (ng0's message of "Sat, 08 Oct 2016 13:58:17 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain ng0 writes: > Hi, > > Kei I think you need to consider packaging one of the "pre" versions of > lynx. I understand we are fixed on packaging this with gnutls, so if you > read the changelog of the recent pre versions releases, you will > discover that there was work on gnutls support. If you don't want to > package pre version itself, there might be patches directly. I don't > know how this all works together and it wasn't my intention to find out > when I looked into this, but we should really consider to package recent > pre release of lynx. Note that this is not dev, dev is more experimental > than pre. > I only see lynx 2.8.9 development tarballs. I don't have a problem targeting those temporarily if it is acceptable to package it and it works. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX+R1EAAoJEOal7jwZRnoNy50QAJDPUmhxUmOQW/LFGtTx/hf4 wNI9Lx3SeCAE0NFYxFqqwbPLLAxFdLsk86uLanxmusAT78eQg06AY8L32C4W62P1 7pBwnXqxuTsoCoL/dgSo4HkoSN0sD/PB8LzW+qsZK2Ohd0vQVgeD02WaVnDYI3Pu O5iclkeJmmnt7qkNCl6GI+dHU9tOMvOLjYtQmqHOo0fgMS7XGjuHkeOz8TL7CoS6 EJdyIO5zvhyEgeI+y+rnnhhgAzCbYzJILpyMPv11zk9AwDBFM0R2A8tqv9vnYaWO ybX+b8+cBbADKM81ooHgPpLEHKaUMWzoSW7yTvDerkab3S/getxs0y2yid4bt4OZ Q33+2tLXX6bi+RbVmeYA4xqT+CEbrrpFPotRSzwOKeEb9ubC3CsW7ucgIWIGXtVl UdTYZiHmUq+5dIq9lKz2UkQ2uIqOkq9HK9uzzMyYjKabytONkKjAnEUj7d763D3B fX4Eb4PkiyZSleUuOQVGEpomtZI3Wswuy8rbjPXeq9hz1AT0uoLdgOzIH2NWt9Us 8BRexLdB7yVsiTdyJx3Y1h4yRkAIllgCCHclOwSueV6nDzxU+yMkyvM4pct/648R ttNoL8OFBQfc7cCU2c7XYBXrPVJqh38nDTAzJVEen3Q2EpOb5twZHKsQOl4IVQB5 V5paTxDs2PyCfibjfkyb =8ZAa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--