ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Kei I think you need to consider packaging one of the "pre" versions of
> lynx. I understand we are fixed on packaging this with gnutls, so if you
> read the changelog of the recent pre versions releases, you will
> discover that there was work on gnutls support. If you don't want to
> package pre version itself, there might be patches directly. I don't
> know how this all works together and it wasn't my intention to find out
> when I looked into this, but we should really consider to package recent
> pre release of lynx. Note that this is not dev, dev is more experimental
> than pre.
>

I only see lynx 2.8.9 development tarballs. I don't have a problem
targeting those temporarily if it is acceptable to package it and it works.