From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: guile-next: Increase timeout. Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2016 11:33:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87twcluask.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20161008080044.12765-1-rekado@elephly.net> <20161009064301.GA4183@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42928) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btAU3-0003P4-2m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 05:33:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btATz-0002rA-Tf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 05:33:26 -0400 Received: from sender163-mail.zoho.com ([74.201.84.163]:21368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1btATz-0002ql-KN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2016 05:33:23 -0400 In-reply-to: <20161009064301.GA4183@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 10:00:44AM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> * gnu/packages/guile.scm (guile-next)[properties]: Set timeout to >> 20 hours. > > Seems fine if that's how long it takes. Wow! The comment above says that it takes in excess of three hours on x86_64. Considering that the build machines for other architectures are less powerful and that they may be building more than one thing at a time I think 20 hours is a very safe choice. (Maybe a bit large, but there’s no harm in that, I think.) ~~ Ricardo