From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add c-toxcore. Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 08:51:20 +0000 Message-ID: <87twa1oc1j.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <20161215191415.7797-1-ng0@libertad.pw> <20161215191415.7797-2-ng0@libertad.pw> <20161217190105.GD1726@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38617) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIXBv-00063W-GF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 03:51:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIXBs-00067M-6y for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 03:51:35 -0500 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:59515) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIXBr-00066e-W1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 03:51:32 -0500 Received: from [10.9.9.212] (helo=mailfront12.runbox.com) by bars.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cIXBo-0001UL-HQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 09:51:28 +0100 Received: from [193.90.12.88] (helo=localhost) by mailfront12.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:892961 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1cIXBb-0001CE-KG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 09:51:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20161217190105.GD1726@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 07:14:14PM +0000, ng0 wrote: >> * gnu/packages/messaging.scm (c-toxcore): New variable. > >> + (version "0.1.0") > > I see a new release: > > https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/tree/v0.1.1 They release very quickly. I can only update this on monday if I'm lucky, possibly later. It's okay if we add the 0.1.0 and update afterwards I think. >> + (source >> + (origin >> + (method url-fetch) >> + (uri (string-append "https://github.com/TokTok/c-toxcore/archive/v" >> + version ".tar.gz")) > > Is this the canonical source of c-toxcore? What is its relationship to > ? Yes, see toktok.github.io or what it was. c-toxcore seems to be where every client is moving to, why how and what reasons there are that it came to be, I'm not really interested in. There's just a pull request to change to c-toxcore for every client, but not all of them yet I think. So we need both at the moment. >> + (arguments >> + `(#:phases >> + (modify-phases %standard-phases >> + (add-after 'unpack 'autoconf >> + (lambda _ >> + (zero? (system* "autoreconf" "-vfi"))))) > > Is there no bootstrapped tarball? Okay if not, I'm just wondering. Sadly no. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 | PGP keys and more: https://n0is.noblogs.org/ | http://ng0.chaosnet.org