From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: Re: [PATCH] opensmtpd: Fix crash during authentication Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:46:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87tvq77v8s.fsf@lassieur.org> References: <8736xs8jvx.fsf@lassieur.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46609) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSnNp-0006yt-Go for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:47:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSnNm-0000hx-Dp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:47:05 -0400 Received: from mail.lassieur.org ([83.152.10.219]:49702) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fSnNm-0000gl-6X for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2018 13:47:02 -0400 In-reply-to: <8736xs8jvx.fsf@lassieur.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Adam Zimmerman Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur writes: > Hi Adam, > > Adam Zimmerman writes: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm running a mail server that I recently migrated to GuixSD, and I >> found this issue when trying to get opensmtpd set up. >> >> When using authentication from a table, opensmtpd would crash whenever I >> tried to authenticate. I found this patch which fixes the issue. It's >> already been merged into the opensmtpd master branch[1], and will be >> fixed in the next release which apparently will be around >> October/November this year. >> >> [1] https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/pull/835 This person [1] says that it can only be reproduced if linking with -pie / configuring with --with-pie. It doesn't seem to me our case. [1] https://github.com/OpenSMTPD/OpenSMTPD/issues/833#issuecomment-367368007