From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Marusich Subject: Re: Patchwork + automated checking and testing of patches Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:45:53 -0800 Message-ID: <87tvjvzgwu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87h8h29z2j.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58220) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTaUz-0005HZ-JH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:46:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTaUy-0000rG-QH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:46:01 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]:39560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gTaUy-0000r5-Kh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Dec 2018 17:46:00 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id 101so5431267pld.6 for ; Sun, 02 Dec 2018 14:46:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87h8h29z2j.fsf@cbaines.net> (Christopher Baines's message of "Wed, 31 Oct 2018 10:43:00 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Christopher Baines Cc: Guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chris, This is really cool stuff! Thanks for looking into it. Christopher Baines writes: > I don't intend to do anything with Jenkins, as I think that wouldn't be > maintainable, but I think setting up some system to check some of the > following would be beneficial: I'm actually a little hesitant to ask, since I don't have time to contribute to this right now, and I don't want to bike-shed. However, I'm just curious: why do you think using Jenkins wouldn't be maintainable? I've read about Jenkins but haven't used it personally, and I've heard good things about it, so I'm curious to know why you prefer to avoid it entirely. =2D-=20 Chris --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEy/WXVcvn5+/vGD+x3UCaFdgiRp0FAlwEYKEACgkQ3UCaFdgi Rp1/Yg/7BE+SdVoAJVt4BIy/qQQp7xJfVm3d/FLBm4x3FC6SzFpDzFN1a626zsFP oP4/TxX+pD8/flNNI/b8pIoEF2MaUqccFCeqhsy5yTy6oRquC/9xY83iufiTPUme g3Zo1Fd4oEMtXf+ubfWMdBN67WhEhCMBEM8GUwyoMM8dNvgp3JdEzwQBG73Ee4sW s/7ZTJEoHYHvs9qDFV0yjC//Dx0KDN7gKlYbgnIE1LYtrKWpxlRor8X6vOQ58PXp //pXgkzETDjK4vj/59e/uxh8AnkRQ+Mv9ZW7z/6QlIC1AylRREXVfvQMWUC6zaUE hGT89WISDjx+6DFZYFoHusq4DcziFnKi8jLIwKuTV0Qv88fDVcjH/dPbw6svpQf5 U4bMyGPt1IVMn/8UpV4dvAeW6TiZie0+1b5l7sfSASy1ZZcJzJ3v/lOeiE01hsHx Yo8GYk/HrU08xWs5Rq1x6O3bGCSKiMre/xmH1OxRfFiq0QwMlA7A8kkRpK407fxW qZoc9eQHj9s6f3nmLp28zR5/1Tt9/WimxBSweGAG7LCOX5n8suWEwf7iQEG7B68o gHaCU95MuKDdJtlP2Pru+f5x/1BYr0sOGao00iB3+Vxt2fGxVfWRsF7UHqnmXeGn RpbADOo3rXl7xkIkJddVQOXr8xa1KFQ16nKyDm9nBov9KryWQCA= =uHr7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--