From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Naming, hacking, and policies Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 20:23:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87tvflzdqs.fsf@elephly.net> References: <875zs3pg5b.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87wokhhj8n.fsf@nckx> <20190329151636.GA5681@jurong> <87wokh638t.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32879) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9x6f-0006jC-B5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:24:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h9x6c-0006wM-PE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:24:00 -0400 In-reply-to: <87wokh638t.fsf_-_@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Andreas Enge skribis: > >> On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 03:02:00PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: >>> I still think this change should be reverted >> >> I also think so. > > I=E2=80=99d also be in favor of reverting. I=E2=80=99m also in favour. A pure revert would not be enough, though, wou= ld it? The new names would need to remain as deprecated names (I know of at least one person who installed some of these games under the long names). -- Ricardo