From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu>
Subject: Re: Guix beyond 1.0: =?utf-8?Q?let=E2=80=99s?= have a roadmap!
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 15:59:57 +0200
Message-ID: <87tvc718de.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net>
References: <877e97vws8.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50447)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2)
 (envelope-from <g@xelera.eu>) id 1hhaNS-00078o-Oz
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:00:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <g@xelera.eu>) id 1hhaNR-0008FF-Mp
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Jun 2019 10:00:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <877e97vws8.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>, Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Guix!

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

[...]

> * devops
>
> ** TODO =E2=80=98guix system reconfigure --target=3Dhost.example.org=E2=
=80=99 is a thing
> ** TODO =E2=80=98guix deploy=E2=80=99 is a thing

** TODO a Guix version of [[NixOps][https://nixos.org/nixops/]]
=20=20=20
Having the two above this last one should not be too hard to achieve
(maybe starting with less provisioning resource than the one currently
supported by NixOps)

Thoughts? Gio'

=2D-=20
Giovanni Biscuolo

Xelera IT Infrastructures

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=y8f0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--