From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Guile 3 migration plan
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 22:29:09 +0100
Message-ID: <87tv4rqgnu.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <874kwvemsw.fsf@inria.fr> <871rrxycs5.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45701)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1itI8J-00057j-Ky
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:29:24 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:40028)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
 id 1itI8J-0006rE-H4
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:29:23 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=33396 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1itI88-0007NV-Qw
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Jan 2020 16:29:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <871rrxycs5.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
 \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 17 Jan 2020 22:48:58 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hi,

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

>>      Once we=E2=80=99re done, we can change (guix self) so that =E2=80=
=98guix pull=E2=80=99
>>      pulls Guix on Guile 3.
>
> The attached patch does that, I tested it with =E2=80=9Cmake as-derivatio=
n=E2=80=9D.
> I=E2=80=99ll do some more testing but unless I=E2=80=99m overlooking some=
thing, we can
> apply it anytime now.

The showstopper is that currently =E2=80=9Cguile3.0-guix=E2=80=9D doesn=E2=
=80=99t build on all
arches:

  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=3Dguile3.0-guix

On AArch64, it=E2=80=99s test failures (that needs to be investigated, but I
suspect it=E2=80=99s nothing serious.)

However, on ARMv7, Guile 3.0 segfaults as it=E2=80=99s building:

  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/8b8c0hxvm9qa5kff168vdr3943cc2s61-guile-next-3=
.0.0

That needs more work!

Ludo=E2=80=99.