From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id qGUhKzQCVl+pawAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 09:49:40 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id KGUFJzQCVl/NEQAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 09:49:40 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 264E89401AE for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2020 09:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56300 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFDmN-0005ZM-6D for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 05:49:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFDlj-0004yA-HG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 05:48:59 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:39532) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kFDlj-0006EK-8D; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 05:48:59 -0400 Received: from [2001:660:6102:320:e120:2c8f:8909:cdfe] (port=54818 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kFDli-0000G8-RG; Mon, 07 Sep 2020 05:48:59 -0400 From: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: Messed up with (guix ssh) References: <878sdr18kw.fsf@gnu.org> <87mu276s7r.fsf@gnu.org> X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 22 Fructidor an 228 de la =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x090B11993D9AEBB5 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 3CE4 6455 8A84 FDC6 9DB4 0CFB 090B 1199 3D9A EBB5 X-OS: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2020 11:48:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87mu276s7r.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:59:52 +0200") Message-ID: <87tuw9or22.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix-devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.01 X-TUID: BGDo42tMgQdL Hi! Jan Nieuwenhuizen skribis: >> So I wanted to give a heads-up and apologize. It got me thinking; this >> patch hadn=E2=80=99t gone through guix-patches, which could have prevent= ed this, >> maybe. > > Thanks for the heads-up and quick fix. I'm often amazed how well > guix-patches work, notably also for catching/preventing silly mistakes. > > I think it's a trade-off and not all black and white, to get a feel > for where the boundary is we have to cross it now and then. Dunno, > very happy with what you're doing :-) Heh, thanks for the kind words. It reminded me of things like =E2=80=9Cgoto fail;=E2=80=9D though, so I tho= ught like giving a heads-up was the least I could do. A similar mistake in git-authenticate.scm or substitute.scm would have a very different effect=E2=80=A6 Ludo=E2=80=99.