From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6C5+EFW4y18pfAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:41:57 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id ENNCDFW4y19IBwAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 16:41:57 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02429402A2 for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:39476 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klad9-0002Em-RV for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:41:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klaNw-0002ao-FC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:26:12 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:43210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klaNn-0003TL-6g; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 11:26:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=WemKB0QyPbfZcyPniZ5Ppev9ZZ0ASuoFemVEoZ0jGdI=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=LvLP0UW3NPeg6343ABmLGRvvmAo6iwiCg4g3k zSJUXiQIJkLhr74QXfdx7vmP1Z4McmoEuZb9hrloTPrK2vk9/CwHR98+hzo9msHpI/Guok aKv4TDbCQ8rMXsudtS83XlIWB7U8MA6PEoeK615en7iX8B2EBw0lwgGov2A74Fd3g9tn/F RFZ9EDDlc/SMd9Rt12b8d8KVqKQecdksXUiuODmLuTfH1bU0JPk1SOhYFgmnS9VCfq9Gfm cFqY2zaQvzAF9Dx8pRt6aw+iStnBHwpbc/9yafUR5WCWxWJgqv6KkNYDZS35r1F4he+wDN MhDkB+6I31tkXSFEAjLiRscwQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a4a01e66 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:26:14 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Andreas Enge , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: [support-renew@gandi.net: [GANDI] guixsd.org expires in 60 days] References: <20201202204709.GB12770@jurong> <87sg8k45gu.fsf@gnu.org> In-reply-to: <87sg8k45gu.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 17:25:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87tut0w76x.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.60 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=LvLP0UW3; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E02429402A2 X-Spam-Score: -4.60 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: jyRTmqyrLh+O --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Guix, I believe that consistently redirecting[0] these old names to=20 guix.gnu.org makes them much less harmful to keep around, and=20 better than giving up control completely. If cost is a pain point, note that Gandi's current annual renewal=20 price of =E2=82=AC19 isn't the lowest around. Ludovic Court=C3=A8s =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > Interestingly, we received bug reports for 1.2.0 where people=20 > referred > to the system as =E2=80=9CGuixSD=E2=80=9D. The name is still often used = in=20 > fora. It's quite common on #guix as well. I wish we could configure=20 sneek to react to certain keywords. No one enjoys playing the=20 broken record, and people tolerate more pedantry from bots than=20 from humans. Kind regards, T G-R [0]:=20 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3Dc85e128= e11d3ba060ae3a6e01da20f531b42d6ef --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX8u0lg0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15d8cBAKMsT6YgBhpPseEZvEKxURpNqiKcsT19mO3KXMlF T6keAP0TWiVMTWTPkvLRtvyw8fjbiIu7DF4XxIf0zIm90PMbDA== =sWKn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--