From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id qOWEENTEW2OPnAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:02:28 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id mK5dENTEW2NVIwAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:02:28 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01F4DBDE for ; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:02:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ooO3l-00087s-4J; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:02:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ooO2v-00075C-Q9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:01:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de ([78.46.223.134]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ooO2p-00079X-0b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:01:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 193714a8; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:00:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=dismail.de; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=20190914; bh=Mteeb76S+4eeVQKBHcKnvdFwYG737mN/E3 lLNbiezKE=; b=NUnGwfqaCrk//kl4tXy9z17KXbR+1wdMAtrQSOfM1/Jx66nkeC heA9TwcjXwS5aYH2micB0XKp/jUXw7m9OHggzRqY2gWucN43IF5RWtcZ3IoOJsVe +sC/nuGTQ+2aay1QFCJq8tlQtPdDvbMSPMOZwI/A8Ys5ufhubLSMoBIuQBCFxYhJ XVq6oG5uE+Jf3yZ9Mu3GHP26qWFMepj4VZ8JQz9yPTkQb3tQtK9qqXjgXnewxll0 L6JznwbswjgCubGJAmMX12knK2S1EJyKJSJBLWMN8AZwle6mzubtVc1hHJu6l4M+ VFNgRPVLkBrCo/5cu4uYok+aXWQ4gFh90ewA== Received: from smtp1.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.11]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 810ba57f; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:00:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp1.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eb4a5d40; Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:00:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 3ca8315f (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:00:53 +0200 (CEST) From: Joshua Branson To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: bokr@bokr.com, =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A9lix?= Baylac =?utf-8?Q?Jacqu=C3=A9?= , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Has guix system ever run a hardware survey? In-Reply-To: <87mt9hjpwp.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:35:02 -0400") References: <87k0514k3g.fsf@alternativebit.fr> <8735bgufy5.fsf@gmail.com> <20221026193732.GA6899@LionPure> <87mt9hjpwp.fsf@gmail.com> X-Gnus-Sucks: I know man Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 08:00:50 -0400 Message-ID: <87tu3oximl.fsf_-_@dismail.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=78.46.223.134; envelope-from=jbranso@dismail.de; helo=mx1.dismail.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "Guix-devel" Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1666958548; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=Ko6WzlbleNSuescoEFNOgeJuyWqaBzxPjC2tWByPGZs=; b=oAyNUpZZYMp1qWdOZ7A2y2Zk9QyMIX2Id7gIQEXmwlqihyU1Rw0/kXxWL/Hy4+Aq4Y8q17 E2UqasolCM1aHDErHMOfdsIaFfar7XKgeTK6B8+nBfSSSXXBAdj0vQ15q27uu31DPa49RP jjZqENuZHtgScfURJBVynA03fU729tySjeuUAG04dnr80FKp991z0L5IUPI9aoDwKvWbKl aYHuU0xkuq786IQZXVax1EhImVe92WsMibl79PKKCdPZSxd5ecYFWC2R2oFi6ZWugi2ho7 +4uVZ/Lxk0xDv1ytM4MjIjq+KvFychsrAekwaCWiJqTrvUYEDEwJpbs02Dvayw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1666958548; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=TyVGlBLVoet1PyM8VERIfTXaauAV18tZcEyS4vGMD2f9Za6MZd/ll/arVyieRJupPZQb95 PIkZ40aVEq32QuZVWSmhkOhOVvuJYVKKcqY1nWBfEYiSYf05fJ3kos5HPzELci9ZSEWFgU ff5bSIiZWkaw253a8cxfAD4mTM0PaMX7kFn4PPIvEfPKcpU3dhqmiCumN9zw+81C1G5hU3 fpG7UhNZBq8IVqNYEGPR6TbE/sc8ZUwUhLLJP94RZulbVpfT1OfuhycJYaiwoakGM+XhLL XOcOGKSz9k9zvu/lB6UO7YOhMof9YNAVznBITWOcoeXPkAbSWRrtblLTrZdyjQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=NUnGwfqa; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.51 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=dismail.de header.s=20190914 header.b=NUnGwfqa; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=dismail.de; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E01F4DBDE X-Spam-Score: -2.51 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: I05qlorbIVOa Maxim Cournoyer writes: > Hi, > > bokr@bokr.com writes: > > [...] > >> >> I opted for the best SSD available for my purism librem13v4 at the time, >> and was really happy with seems like 10x faster than the SATA SSD in my older >> but still i7 x86_64 previous laptop. Prob really 4-5x faster. >> > > Building Rust is mostly CPU dependent; I think fast single thread > performance is key as not that much happen in parallel, IIRC. The 3900X > is a 12 cores (24 logical) beast. > This makes me wonder what sort of data we'd get if we asked guix system users what sort of machine they use guix system on. I've got an os-booted Thinkpad T400. My core 2 duo seems pretty slow compared to what ya'll have. :)