From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: cmake: Bump to 2.8.12 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 11:42:51 +0100 Message-ID: <87sivktl1w.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ob6gpd5k.fsf@karetnikov.org> <1382568076-1229-1-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com> <87mwltugxe.fsf@gnu.org> <20131029082252.GB11759@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40155) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vb6lJ-0006EB-AI for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:43:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vb6lA-0002AV-Nj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:43:01 -0400 Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.83]:35390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vb6lA-0002AA-HX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 06:42:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131029082252.GB11759@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Tue, 29 Oct 2013 09:22:52 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:14:21AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Qt doesn=E2=80=99t depend on CMake AFAICS. Am I missing something? > > No, but kde does, which is the main "consumer" of qt. Probably I was > confusing things. Ah, OK. >> So it had two test failures (=E2=80=98volume-test=E2=80=99 and =E2=80=98= thread-test=E2=80=99) on >> hydra.gnu.org (which runs 2.6.32-xen), and none on my laptop (which runs >> 3.0.43). >> I restarted the build a couple of times on hydra and it eventually >> succeeded... >> Not satisfying, but to me that suggests a timing issue. > > If it happens again, maybe we should disable parallel tests? AFAICS the PulseAudio 4.0 tarball was generated with Automake 1.11, where the =E2=80=98parallel-tests=E2=80=99 driver was disabled by default. = So tests are run sequentially already. We=E2=80=99d need to report it upstream, but I don=E2=80=99t really have en= ough info. So it=E2=80=99d be great if someone could reproduce it and try to gather mo= re details. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.