From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: fix some issues cross-compiling glib Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 21:36:10 +0100 Message-ID: <87sihg6ybp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1416306870-1177-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56074) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqpVj-0004UN-Fw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:36:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XqpVe-0005mL-L5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 15:36:27 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1416306870-1177-1-git-send-email-jmd@gnu.org> (John Darrington's message of "Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:34:30 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: John Darrington Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org John Darrington skribis: > From: John Darrington > > * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib) : Moved inputs to native-inputs, > and change "inputs" to "%build-inputs" OK for the former, but why the latter? In general I think it=E2=80=99s stylistically better to refer to the =E2=80=98inputs=E2=80=99 argument. Also, what about somehow grouping big-rebuild changes together? I=E2=80=99m slightly worried by the post-release chaos that might occur. :-) Maybe core-updates, or maybe a more specific branch for cross-compilation fixes? > + ;; The following ought to be achieved by (native-self-input #t). > + ;; Unfortunately it seems to only set glib:out. We want glib:bin Missing period at end of sentence. (And you found a bug!) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.