From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add wmctrl.
Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2014 23:29:48 +0100
Message-ID: <87sigstns3.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87oaridzoj.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4qk27at.fsf@gnu.org>
	<878uiko99a.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36552)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XxNrZ-0004En-0U
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:30:14 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XxNrM-0001uF-0h
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:30:04 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:49919)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1XxNrL-0001tr-QL
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Dec 2014 17:29:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: <878uiko99a.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Sat, 06 Dec
	2014 22:42:25 +0300")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s (2014-12-06 17:15 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
> [...]
>>> - Is it ok to make "wmctrl.scm" or would it be more appropriate to put
>>>   it into "xdisorg.scm"?
>>
>> xdisorg.scm would seem preferable to me.
>
> OK, then I think "unclutter" should go there as well.  What about "scrot"?

Unclutter seems to come from x.org, so it either belongs in xorg.scm
(Andreas?) or xdisorg.scm, IMO.  Scrot seems like it could go in
xdisorg.scm.

> I have not committed yet: I have a concern that "wmctrl" will bring a
> dependency on (gnu packages glib) to =E2=80=9Cxdisorg.scm=E2=80=9D.  Woul=
d it be a
> problem?

Normally no.  Try =E2=80=9Cmake clean-go && make=E2=80=9D to be sure.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.