From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: pbr: Update to 1.6.0 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 11:43:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87si6pp7p4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <1441573678-24940-1-git-send-email-tipecaml@gmail.com> <20150907090705.GA6548@debian> <55EE14B0.3020305@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47354) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZFRG-0008C8-NL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 05:43:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZFRC-0008CL-NE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 05:43:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55EE14B0.3020305@gmail.com> (Cyril Roelandt's message of "Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:50:24 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Cyril Roelandt Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Cyril Roelandt skribis: > On 09/07/2015 11:07 AM, Andreas Enge wrote: >> This looks harmless to push > > Btw, is it OK to directly push such changes? Yes, see =E2=80=9CCommit Access=E2=80=9D in =E2=80=98HACKING=E2=80=99. Bas= ically if there=E2=80=99s too much rebuilding, or a potential for disruption or controversy, post it here. Let me know if you think this should be clarified. Ludo=E2=80=99.