From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: lua: Build with dynamic library support. Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 21:49:22 +0100 Message-ID: <87si4t763x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <45ab1898e5c08ef1f8c7070eae77c58e5dd40296.1445918045.git.leo@famulari.name> <87oafkv5pz.fsf@gnu.org> <1445955233.2825572.421511113.088B9586@webmail.messagingengine.com> <87pp00tir8.fsf@gnu.org> <1446003135.1901797.421991889.3664784B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1446072440.2753757.423058985.0E24BE56@webmail.messagingengine.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46008) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zru8X-0005gz-TC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:49:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zru8T-000311-Rt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 16:49:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1446072440.2753757.423058985.0E24BE56@webmail.messagingengine.com> (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:47:20 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > I decided to compare the log files after analyzing the lua-5.1 Makefile > and realizing that my original patch should make no difference for > lua-5.1 (it would make a difference for lua-5.2). And if that is the > case, why am I getting different results? Maybe it does have an effect after all? Sorry for any confusion I might have spread. > The missing '-DLUA_USE_LINUX' is the issue for the lua-5.1 in master. > That flag specifies the use of dlopen, among other things. So you found the culprit? Ludo=E2=80=99.