From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace broken LADSPA URL.
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 17:04:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87si2l44x2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87fv05oi2l.fsf@elephly.net> <87611110bq.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ziydlzzb.fsf@elephly.net> <87bnas7gcd.fsf@gnu.org>
	<878u4g2bvf.fsf@gmail.com> <87lh8frqgj.fsf@gmail.com>
	<8737umo8uh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuymim89.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87bn9ailxs.fsf@gmail.com> <87mvsu4bjt.fsf@elephly.net>
	<8760zhmm4q.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50389)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1aDwlX-0002Kc-0D
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:04:51 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mthl@gnu.org>) id 1aDwlV-0004PN-Vf
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Dec 2015 11:04:50 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8760zhmm4q.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Vong's message of "Tue, 29 Dec
	2015 21:15:33 +0800")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alex Vong <alexvong1995@gmail.com>
Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>

Alex Vong <alexvong1995@gmail.com> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> Alex Vong <alexvong1995@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
>>> +       (uri (list (string-append "http://http.debian.net"
>>> +                                 "/debian/pool/main/l/ladspa-sdk/ladsp=
a-sdk_"
>>> +                                 version
>>> +                                 ".orig.tar.gz")
>>
>> My preference is to keep =E2=80=9Cversion=E2=80=9D and the following str=
ing on the same
>> line because they are both short.
>>
> Is it a lisp / scheme convention to do this? I always think I should
> call a function like this:
> (func arg1 arg2 ...)
> or
> (func arg1
>       arg2
>       ...)
>

You are right.  What you have described is the general rule.
Nonetheless in the case of =E2=80=98string-append=E2=80=99, some of us like=
 to make an
exception probably because the general rule wastes a lot of lines
without improving clarity.

--
Mathieu Lirzin