From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: gnutls 'name-constraints' test failure
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:02:13 +0200
Message-ID: <87shv5kch6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <578A854F.30302@cock.li> <20160717073206.GA17182@jasmine>
	<87shv84crp.fsf@gnu.org> <20160717173334.GA2626@jasmine>
	<20160718164855.GA3227@jasmine> <20160718171552.GA20926@jasmine>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44771)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bPUfG-0006ib-5G
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:02:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bPUfA-0005RY-U8
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2016 09:02:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160718171552.GA20926@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Mon,
	18 Jul 2016 13:15:52 -0400")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:48:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 01:33:34PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: gnutls: Fix test failure.
>> >=20
>> > * gnu/packages/patches/gnutls-fix-stale-test.patch: New file.
>> > * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
>> > * gnu/packages/tls.scm (gnutls)[replacement]: New field.
>> > (gnutls/fixed): New variable.
>>=20
>> Mark pointed out that using a graft won't work, since the ungrafted and
>> unpatched gnutls will still need to be built.

Bah, indeed!

> Unfortunately, the version of gnutls in core-updates (3.5.0) does not
> include the fix. It was introduced in 3.5.2.

So GnuTLS already doesn=E2=80=99t build on core-updates, right?  In that ca=
se,
we should go ahead an update it.

WDYT?

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.