* aseprite is now EULA licensed.
@ 2016-09-03 0:55 ng0
2016-09-03 8:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2016-09-03 0:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
2 days ago they changed from gpl-2 to eula. This could theoretically
mean we can update to 1.1.7 and freeze it there (hoping that a
compatible licensed fork appears or whatever will happen)?
http://dev.aseprite.org/post/149797781837/new-source-code-license
https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/commit/5ecc356a41c8e29977f8608d8826489d24f5fa6c
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: aseprite is now EULA licensed.
2016-09-03 0:55 aseprite is now EULA licensed ng0
@ 2016-09-03 8:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-09-03 10:43 ` ng0
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2016-09-03 8:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
Hello,
ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
> 2 days ago they changed from gpl-2 to eula. This could theoretically
> mean we can update to 1.1.7 and freeze it there (hoping that a
> compatible licensed fork appears or whatever will happen)?
>
> http://dev.aseprite.org/post/149797781837/new-source-code-license
> https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/commit/5ecc356a41c8e29977f8608d8826489d24f5fa6c
I think the license change is a wrong way to solve the developer
problem.
Anyway, this raises an interesting question: would it make sense for
Guix to allow an optional `donate' keyword associated to a list of URLs
package definitions?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: aseprite is now EULA licensed.
2016-09-03 8:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
@ 2016-09-03 10:43 ` ng0
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ng0 @ 2016-09-03 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Goaziou, guix-devel
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>
>> 2 days ago they changed from gpl-2 to eula. This could theoretically
>> mean we can update to 1.1.7 and freeze it there (hoping that a
>> compatible licensed fork appears or whatever will happen)?
>>
>> http://dev.aseprite.org/post/149797781837/new-source-code-license
>> https://github.com/aseprite/aseprite/commit/5ecc356a41c8e29977f8608d8826489d24f5fa6c
>
> I think the license change is a wrong way to solve the developer
> problem.
>
> Anyway, this raises an interesting question: would it make sense for
> Guix to allow an optional `donate' keyword associated to a list of URLs
> package definitions?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou 0x80A93738
>
Interesting idea.. it would allow metadata for the package listing
webview in the future and if someone wants to donate they don't have to
search the project websites, but could get a direct link to their web
site which lists details if available.
I don't know if we can do that, but I'd be in favor for it as there is
no damage attached for all involved parties.
--
ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-09-03 10:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-03 0:55 aseprite is now EULA licensed ng0
2016-09-03 8:57 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-09-03 10:43 ` ng0
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).