From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: ed: Replace with 1.14.1 [fixes security issues].
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:44:04 -0500
Message-ID: <87shomdfdn.fsf@netris.org>
References: <20170112201353.29406-1-mbakke@fastmail.com>
	<20170112215005.GA13508@jasmine>
	<87o9zc54d8.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<20170112221723.GA20450@jasmine> <87r347rtv0.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34043)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1cS5tl-0007Sq-7L
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:44:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1cS5ti-0003ZO-4I
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2017 12:44:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87r347rtv0.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 13 Jan 2017 14:07:31 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:56:51PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>>>=20
>>> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 09:13:53PM +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:
>>> >> * gnu/packages/ed.scm (ed-1.14.1): New variable.
>>> >> (ed)[replacement]: New field.
>>> >
>>> > Can you add a comment with a link to the bug report?
>>> >
>>> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-ed/2017-01/msg00000.html
>>>=20
>>> Good find. I wonder, was this issue only present in the unreleased
>>> 1.14.0? I can't reproduce it with the current Guix version.
>>
>> Good catch; I can only reproduce it with 1.14, and the ed maintainer
>> points out that it was introduced in 1.14.
>>
>>> I'll wait and see what the response on oss-sec is. Maybe we can just
>>> push the update to core-updates.
>>
>> I think it's fine for core-updates.
>
> With 200 dependent packages, it could even go to =E2=80=98master=E2=80=99.

"guix refresh -l" is _way_ off in this case.  'ed' is a native-input for
'patch', which is of course entails a full rebuild.

       Mark