Ludovic Courtès writes: > Marius Bakke skribis: > >> Marius Bakke writes: >> >>> Patch attached. I *think* the two values are for client and server >>> respectively, but will study the source and build logs some more to make >>> sure we're adjusting the right knobs. >>> >>> I suggest we try this on 'core-updates' if the patch is correct. >> >> The patch builds fine on x86_64, and I've verified that these are the >> correct settings by decreasing the values instead of increasing. >> >> What do you think? Should we check if 25s is high enough on >> 'core-updates' or push it directly to 'master'? > > Good catch. > > It might be best to push to ‘core-updates’ to focus our build > resources. No strong opinion though. I pushed it to 'core-updates'.