From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: The future of 'guix environment' Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 14:08:22 +0200 Message-ID: <87shg6wrih.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87efrsyzl4.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3py63j4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43791) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnkka-0005kv-B7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:08:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnkkV-0005eb-FM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 08:08:40 -0400 In-reply-to: <87y3py63j4.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: guix-devel Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Thompson, David writes: >> […] which is written in Go. No thanks! > > No thanks here too. A yoghurt language just to run a shell, ugh. The term “yoghurt […]” for software with bootstrapping problems will be mainstream any day now :) (But isn’t Go actually okay in terms of bootstrapping thanks to the GCC implementation?) -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net