From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Update of Emacs to 26.1. Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 13:32:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87sh6ar932.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87wovnr399.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87k1rmbyb5.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNctj-0005Hv-Br for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 07:34:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNctg-0000VK-9H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 07:34:39 -0400 Received: from pegasus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.20]:46580) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNctf-0000Qy-Up for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 07:34:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k1rmbyb5.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost writes: > Ricardo Wurmus (2018-05-28 21:25 +0200) wrote: > > [...] >> The update did break =E2=80=9Cemacs-minimal=E2=80=9D and thus all Emac= s packages, but >> that can be fixed by passing =E2=80=9C--with-gnutls=3Dno=E2=80=9D to e= macs-minimal: > > I like it! I think '*-minimal' packages should be as minimal as possib= le. =E2=80=9Cemacs-minimal=E2=80=9D already didn=E2=80=99t have gnutls among = its inputs, but the build system now complains about this unless the configure flags make that explicit to show intent. After the update =E2=80=9Cemacs-minimal=E2=80=9D broke because the build = system couldn=E2=80=99t find gnutls (because it wasn=E2=80=99t among the inputs) and because we d= idn=E2=80=99t indicate that this was intentional. --=20 Ricardo