From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: gcc-4.7.4: libgcc2.h:157: error: unable to emulate 'TF' Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2018 17:07:36 +0200 Message-ID: <87sh4rm8nb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sh4sny8j.fsf@gnu.org> <5B43A955.7090904@mutluit.com> <87muv0nqoi.fsf@gnu.org> <5B442D84.8030805@mutluit.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: List-Unsubscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-help-owner@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits"'s message of "Tue, 10 Jul 2018 09:31:53 +0200") To: =?utf-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Cc: um@mutluit.com, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org, Guix-devel List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: > It seems that the errors you were getting are related to 128 bit > floating point support. It also seems that 128 bit floating point > support is enabled on 64 bits. I'm not sure about the 32 bit case > though, do you get the same error there? =C2=A0 Ah! That makes me even more supicious... I was wondering about this command i386-unknown-linux-gcc ... -DIN_GCC -o _muldi3.o -c ../.././libgcc/libg= cc2.c this i386-unknown-linux-gcc compiler is the bootstrap compiler, gcc-4.1.0 (or we may be able to use 2.95.3); is that OK? Shouldn't the new `xgcc' compiler be used to compile libgcc2? janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com