From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Giovanni Biscuolo Subject: Re: virtual network interfaces in container Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:01:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87sgwqdcjh.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> References: <871s4befpe.fsf@roquette.mug.biscuolo.net> <87pnrvteb6.fsf@cbaines.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:32906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guBzs-0001jN-B4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 03:03:54 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guBxj-0001Vm-Hs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 03:01:43 -0500 Received: from ns13.heimat.it ([46.4.214.66]:32814) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1guBxg-0001Rl-KA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 03:01:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pnrvteb6.fsf@cbaines.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Christopher Baines Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Chris, Christopher Baines writes: [...] > So, a while back, I did send a patch to at least allow sharing the hosts > network, just like the --network flag to guix environment. this would be a nice feature! we still couldn't have isolated network interfaces per container but it's a very useful feature having declaratively managed "guix system container"s [1] is great but they are not so useful without networking, or am I missing some important use case here? > The patch is here [1], unfortunately, it's been a while since I looked > at it. I should really try and neaten it up and get it merged in, but > it's there if that's useful to you. > > 1: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D28128 I've looked at it but AFAIU your patch https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D28128#8 is still to be reworked https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D28128#14 sorry but I'm still not able to test and adapt it to Guix, I cannot help here [...] Thanks! Giovanni [1] although I still miss the possibility to nest a container/VM declaration in the host configuration.scm... but we can work it out =2D-=20 Giovanni Biscuolo Xelera IT Infrastructures --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEERcxjuFJYydVfNLI5030Op87MORIFAlxlIEIACgkQ030Op87M ORK7Dw//eEAKkyMwR+oMa5GLC4gIi3q3m5Dr73Ft7kxgBB4C/rPbhzhvwfQjsolR BG4IwOklscvHBlTLS/UEPDjxk6oNeprTgb7ZEz5eGLOxXqrg/2GCFd+MOA+UCL4W w6F69NPs1DfUpL2IReO0nKEhmiDXhMrydZoD4ONlejhTOYArCEmbfytf+NddDCJo p/0QSgG+QMtu5MUmuC8tRPOmakTa7Juw7GlcJVxDTlrqhBr4uJKsfDOovQckwX+K cbSc5hOx33CGq+gYoOALjM2apw/3WWtTH2fbanmStdPlOrXyuYUPiVpXc8yLDqOo 6ZKWhPvcU9C2FFYXTCZ/UqxuHeCBl4BF4JiF7q4LdOdhFRjb0Svp6bekZTfD187S Myj0V4sKJuzUTITahVOm6HbzJNiLGBSlost5HLOiP2gRubY8kaX4kWDy1lgxM6WY 6aKcBUDVlHw8hsgjU2u17UOQM8RwaGm3hYSpP1ducyYROviprbS112xllIshICRF ZsxwUbPT7RjNzxI0aCn154yBPWAQlKwDcJ11hna7wdGqOxsOr6GOiCPWWsynAgQp izBlPSi//z3w92TcHOAaPE1GSTvFpSMgHFbM28juvZ1+daYn2kjBaqmX1eR2qZ7i KN/naUYkd0deRdbE2V1gyFnok4b/wS9Sc6m6cXsiyuRIZc/rksk= =xDRG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--