From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: Using CLISP instead of CCL to bootstrap SBCL
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2019 15:01:10 +0200
Message-ID: <87sgpe3l9l.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <87d0gnljf6.fsf@netris.org> <87o9079hef.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
 <87v9ub57gy.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9ua3m25.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48163)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1i4lxN-0005J1-HQ
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 09:01:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1i4lxK-0001Xf-LC
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 09:01:15 -0400
Received: from relay11.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.231]:55811)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1i4lxK-0001Si-Eq
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Sep 2019 09:01:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87v9ua3m25.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hmmm, after some reading it seems that CMUCL suffers from the same issue
as CCL:

https://gitlab.common-lisp.net/cmucl/cmucl/wikis/InstallingCmucl

I'd need to test to make sure though.

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl1tEpYACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH+kCQf/cN7Tzy4Ngn56wI9OCkBN9QVonZB3bK6xJu9a9w0CQCEyg33s9UUCq/7c
MjtDg+hSHJ/39Od7CWvWNmZTYHOj33XQjrunOUjPI5MZyR4GEg0QBh37nHzee7QQ
pjXAslC7HeKe0jW8ObrKkjb43Cn9dxoDFPs8ZJ8+QHqhztWv/7briszG3BKlxt+m
HRxpU4VGIitXA0Qw8aARUVlKyCz2EY4etHVjBpov+swx7rnyi1pjXoOxgVD/y8RQ
RT+J7Lzj47egaGIh2L1VcqU2v+VRw5vaoo7NJ5TKT8QnKI/r+2rG4QDavIh1cpS6
sia1E4I673TPrNaPuO4PoDX4SkIMow==
=kUYu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--