From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: Maintaining GNU Jami package for Guix
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2019 20:02:22 +0100
Message-ID: <87sgn77741.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <20191018205608.45b264dc@kompiuter>
 <20191031211919.175c3f29@interia.pl> <87bltwpn4w.fsf@devup.no>
 <20191101130139.6193f6df@interia.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56541)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1iQcBp-00061n-Bm
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:02:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1iQcBo-0006Zg-DT
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:02:29 -0400
Received: from relay9-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.199]:51727)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1iQcBo-0006X9-7A
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2019 15:02:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20191101130139.6193f6df@interia.pl>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Jan Wielkiewicz <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl>, Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jan Wielkiewicz <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> writes:

> Why can't we just keep paralell version for a package? Like=20
> gnutls @ 3.6.7, gnutls @ 3.6.9 etc?=20=20=20

Because gnutls with Jami patches should not be called gnutls: it's a
non-vanilla version of GnuTLS.  And I doubt it would be useful to anyone
but Jami.


=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl28gT4ACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH85rQf9FzvOKytIndpLMyjEkaW0oDM5GQKalAq41YUrT/Lc6t1bnMH4QUxVKbGi
RyOEhfQSfRISHON11u4P8nF1e+E8k7fJjLijaP804SiA/lzDUmJYSkC0L0baSq/t
azcFdpayNRTz94TaZMU3oh083uPfu3XGL7Eyi5QoLqlygpL3CIAYaE/vUnG7fZcv
TWq5ls8YEsvLLdErgGGXncH8LZ7yer6flCvzbUghX16rGsH9Z4GgyuQitl0LIh7P
ycFQSfHoaeLrwpIBGX1ohHgvIRiiaMMfGG9gwqQRGhmrxg+TTg4rGaxob35b6aIr
ouCVQUPSCvL0OZoo8eM/EH+QEbz9xw==
=kozk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--