Jan Wielkiewicz writes: > Why can't we just keep paralell version for a package? Like > gnutls @ 3.6.7, gnutls @ 3.6.9 etc? Because gnutls with Jami patches should not be called gnutls: it's a non-vanilla version of GnuTLS. And I doubt it would be useful to anyone but Jami. -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/