Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès skribis: >> >>> Hi Guillaume, >>> >>> Guillaume Le Vaillant skribis: >>> >>>> Currently no substitutes are built for the testing branch because the >>>> evaluation fails. The log at https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/16794/log/raw >>>> ends with: >>> >>> You mean the ‘staging’ branch? >>> >> >> Yes, I meant 'staging'. I often type 'testing' instead of 'staging', >> probably that pesky muscle memory!. >> >>>> guix/inferior.scm:247:2: ERROR: >>>> 1. &inferior-exception: >>>> [...] >>>> >>>> If I understand this correctly, there's a '#:builder' keyword somewhere >>>> that is causing a problem. Does someone know where it can come from, or >>>> how to fix the issue? >>> >>> Right. I’d look at guix/build-system/asdf.scm:279:2 on that branch (per >>> the inferior stack trace above). Does that give useful info? >> >> I didn't see any obvious problem in that file; the strange thing is that >> 'make', 'make as-derivation' and './pre-inst-env guix build ...' all >> work fine. >> >> In a local branch I merged the current master (3699ed6) into staging >> (de96ed1) and I'm going to try to start a local cuirass daemon to see >> wether I can reproduce the issue or not. >> >> Given that merging master in staging hasn't been done in a while, should >> I also push my updated staging branch, or maybe someone is already >> working on it? > > Ok, I started a local Cuirass, I reproduced the evaluation failure, and > I think I found the problem: Cuirass was choking on the definition of > the ecl-slynk package. I fixed it and know the evaluation has > been 'In progress...' for 15 minutes. > Then, if the evaluation completes successfully, and if there are no > objections, I'll push the updated staging branch. The evaluation succeeded on my local Cuirass. Fix pushed to staging as b6c55a723fab94bbf710c331fe62d839fb0bf6ad.