From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uHjeEwKoAGDAUQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:22:26 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id ODbNDwKoAGDMHgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:22:26 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA75940274 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46290 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l098T-0003ox-0h for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:22:25 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56822) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l0961-0002ML-3q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:19:54 -0500 Received: from tobias.gr ([2a02:c205:2020:6054::1]:59806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l095v-00058q-DK; Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:19:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobias.gr; s=2018; bh=LCLO2W/1+KMbmzoxnJ4gtc5//x1sJfb6yTZiqiFimfE=; h=date:in-reply-to: references:subject:cc:to:from; b=mfLzxkuvy+Ry78s9dLGO/In0AW9R79ivFTX7K 5EbV38DFkOmPhH5g+d9aA2MkfzGw/TOUz4zhzSQs8jwp+X4NQhdcJaZc+Ltb1mcwDMT1p/ XFM9ktx543BXQ56GK6v/qD4Su2FHIIul3k5m3uFM1wz1WPUW/njJMYxyohgdZzUY11AB09 7XtRlLjGHZaZt8o/IO0mFQyLjCJ4nOVNNBpSQ843HI25KyARQtIO7iej9cvO+U9i04f6G2 f3aT25ZG5C+qT1ElRG6D+PNeeISce4JI+Y2h75MWVX86oDbmQgvDrsOhJqV4eOruUDtD9D ACHq322+lJSlZs1g03QBomnlA== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 9915c2ed (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Thu, 14 Jan 2021 20:20:17 +0000 (UTC) BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: Staging branch [substitute availability] References: <87eein6hf6.fsf@gnu.org> <874kjjrf3w.fsf@nckx> <87lfcv4wqe.fsf@gnu.org> In-reply-to: <87lfcv4wqe.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 21:19:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87sg73qnj5.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -4.66 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=mfLzxkuv; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1AA75940274 X-Spam-Score: -4.66 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: 3cZJekyyrk3D --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mathieu, Mathieu Othacehe =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > As I said, the new remote building Cuirass mechanism is not yet=20 > deployed > on those machines and I would need someone with login access to > reconfigure those machines for me. I reconfigured dmitri and have now also restarted guix-daemon. Is there anything more I need to do? Remotely rebooting has=20 proven risky in the past. >> The situation is worse for x86_64: 96% idleness based on=20 >> /proc/uptime. Am I >> misinterpreting? > > On what machine? All build nodes (141.*). Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYACnXg0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15OJcBAO0e1m+NygU7dganfsxsGV3eDmOC8f0x/RjOGm0N 4wFQAP9HCjJwDLzqjR5eZUW/IA85qdJMr861uItRaUSM9UaYDA== =YiYL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--