From: Richard Sent <richard@freakingpenguin.com>
To: raingloom@riseup.net
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: watchdog triggered auto-rollback
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 12:58:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sey5su9e.fsf@freakingpenguin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5521e876c1944cf001dd4cac4553f738@riseup.net> (raingloom@riseup.net's message of "Fri, 24 May 2024 12:50:47 +0000")
raingloom@riseup.net writes:
> Would others find this useful? Where in the stack would this be solved?
> Could we, for example, catch an issue in the init system and still
> perform a rollback? Or if not a full rollback, then at least a reboot
> into the previous config? (And if that is also broken, then the one
> before, etc, etc)
>
> Obviously there are a lot of edge cases and potential bugs in this
> mechanism as well. Sticking with the SSH example, rolling back to a
> version that was kept around where the authorized keys are different
> would also make the machine unreachable via SSH.
I would definitely find this useful, particularly when combined with
unattended-upgrade-service. I don't know the best way to handle an init
system failure.
Perhaps a starting point would be a one-shot
conditional-rollback-service with a "shepherd-requirements" field and a
"test" field that takes an file-like object. This service would execute
that file, write the output to some log file, and trigger a rollback if
an error is signaled.
Presumably this service should only trigger on boot, not reconfigure so
we don't risk running the test with old services. I don't believe Guix
has a mechanism yet to say "Yes, this service is new, and I /do/ want
Shepherd to auto-start it, but not on reconfigure". This shouldn't be
too hard to add though.
--
Take it easy,
Richard Sent
Making my computer weirder one commit at a time.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-25 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-24 12:50 watchdog triggered auto-rollback raingloom
2024-05-25 16:58 ` Richard Sent [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-05-28 0:52 Nathan Dehnel
2024-05-28 1:46 ` Richard Sent
2024-05-28 10:10 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-05-29 13:45 ` Richard Sent
2024-05-29 20:41 ` Attila Lendvai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sey5su9e.fsf@freakingpenguin.com \
--to=richard@freakingpenguin.com \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=raingloom@riseup.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).