From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Gnunet-0.10.0 recipe
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 00:00:39 +0100
Message-ID: <87r47jkdig.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <52EA7F73.9010302@totakura.in> <20140130223912.GA12116@debian>
	<52EAD88B.70409@totakura.in> <52EAE140.8090805@totakura.in>
	<20140131085355.GA4396@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
	<20140203221717.GA23992@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60294)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1WASaJ-0005m4-0c
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:05:52 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1WASaD-0004zl-N6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:05:46 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:55980)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1WASaD-0004za-Gd
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Feb 2014 18:05:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20140203221717.GA23992@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon,
	3 Feb 2014 23:17:17 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> The "official" description printed with "make sync-descriptions" is diffe=
rent,
> but in fact adds only this sentence:
>    The package includes gnunet-gtk, which provides a GTK+ graphical user
>    interface to the GNUnet service.
> I think here the official description should be changed. First of all,
> what is "the package"? And as far as I can tell, gnunet-gtk would be a
> distinct package.

Right.

For the record, patches for pkgblurbs.txt (the file containing those
descriptions in GNU Womb) should go to bug-womb@gnu.org.

Ludo=E2=80=99.