From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Font package naming convention Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 10:01:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87r3wz1s4k.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87ioj1sccx.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <87ppd9e6ah.fsf@gmail.com> <20141030191743.GB19999@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <878ujxdxmj.fsf@gmail.com> <20141031175840.GA16902@debian> <87sii4q64v.fsf@gnu.org> <20141101095205.GB30939@debian> <87ioixo71g.fsf@gnu.org> <20141102174935.GF6865@debian> <87d294u0la.fsf@gnu.org> <20141103093001.GB7644@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr18o-00036c-9S for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:01:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr18a-0003OA-St for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:01:34 -0500 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:32824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xr18a-0003O5-L3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:01:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20141103093001.GB7644@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of "Mon, 3 Nov 2014 10:30:01 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost I think there were a couple of packages submitted, notably the Liberation font. What about resubmitting them following the agreed-upon naming convention, Alex? Andreas, could you take a look at updating the guidelines? Do you want to handle the rename of existing font packages as well? Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.