From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Server unrresponsive
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:11:36 +0100
Message-ID: <87r3ufri07.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <f6d5913b52c39ac6bb4383f5fc7b7cf2@openmailbox.org>
	<87sif4uqcx.fsf@gnu.org> <54C80903.6040800@totakura.in>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41643)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YGEMJ-0005rd-UO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:11:44 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YGEMF-00028D-W0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:11:43 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:36040)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YGEMF-000289-U9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:11:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <54C80903.6040800@totakura.in> (Sree Harsha Totakura's message of
	"Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:54:11 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha@totakura.in>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha@totakura.in> skribis:

> On 01/21/2015 04:04 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>> This message suggests that hydra.gnu.org, the server that provides
>> pre-compiled binaries, is somewhat slow.
>>=20
>> This is unfortunately too frequent and we hope to switch to a more
>> powerful front-end server.
>>=20
> I believe switching to hydra.gnunet.org may be helpful.  Have you
> considered it?

I think we have just the right size in terms of x86 build machines.  The
front-end itself shouldn=E2=80=99t also be a build machine, because it alre=
ady
has enough to do (evaluations + HTTP requests, which includes providing
compressed archives on demand.)

So I would like to keep hydra.gnunet.org as a build machine and to
switch to a dedicated box for the front-end.

The FSF might be able to help with that, otherwise we=E2=80=99ll go ahead a=
nd
get ourselves another machine, I think.  But I think it=E2=80=99s time to f=
ix
that issue now.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.