Re: '-light' vs. '-minimal' packages

[Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1066 bytes --]

Ludovic Courtès (2015-09-04 00:11 +0300) wrote:

> Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> From e040b70e23f04fca1c91123751ce8b6e28719bb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:12:28 +0300
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: bash-light: Rename to bash-minimal.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/bash.scm (bash-light): Rename to ...
>>   (bash-minimal): ...this.
>>   (static-bash): Use it.
>> * gnu/packages/make-bootstrap.scm (%bash-static): Use it.
>
> This should go to ‘core-updates’, where there’s an additional reference
> to update in commencement.scm.  OK with this change.

I made this patch specifically for ‘core-updates’ and I don't see any
reference to ‘bash-light’ in (gnu packages commencement) there.  AFAICS
‘bash-light’ is used in ‘static-bash-for-glibc’ only in master.  Or do I
miss anything?

I have also noticed that there is another ‘…-light’ package in
‘core-updates’ — ‘coreutils-light’, so I'm attaching the patch to rename
this one as well.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gnu-coreutils-light-Rename-to-coreutils-minimal.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1716 bytes --]

From 91c7da081fc532892ce6e351a7a719d162d6196a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:50:11 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: coreutils-light: Rename to coreutils-minimal.

* gnu/packages/base.scm (coreutils-light): Rename to ...
  (coreutils-minimal): ...this.
* gnu/packages/commencement.scm (%boot5-inputs): Use it.
---
 gnu/packages/base.scm         | 4 ++--
 gnu/packages/commencement.scm | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/base.scm b/gnu/packages/base.scm
index f4efce2..76fd111 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/base.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/base.scm
@@ -293,11 +293,11 @@ functionality beyond that which is outlined in the POSIX standard.")
    (license gpl3+)
    (home-page "http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/")))
 
-(define-public coreutils-light
+(define-public coreutils-minimal
   ;; Coreutils without its optional dependencies.
   (package
     (inherit coreutils)
-    (name "coreutils-light")
+    (name "coreutils-minimal")
     (outputs '("out"))
     (inputs '())))
 
diff --git a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
index caadc94..006aee5 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/commencement.scm
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ exec \"~a\" \"$@\"\n"
 
       ;; Grep's test suite uses 'timeout' from Coreutils to execute command,
       ;; and yet these commands need to see the valid 'LOCPATH'.
-      ("coreutils" ,(new-libc-package coreutils-light))
+      ("coreutils" ,(new-libc-package coreutils-minimal))
 
       ;; We just wrap the remaining binaries (tar, gzip, xz, etc.)  so that
       ;; they ignore 'LOCPATH' (if they did not, they would be hit by an
-- 
2.4.3